But that is
only part of the story.
Cognitive science tells us that the brain handles a little and a lot of information – around 40 bits of information consciously while unconsciously it’s around 11 million bits per second. The 40 bits is where shoppers’ behavioural choices can be observed however the 11 million bits of information that drive decisions such as products, brands, pricing and the POS remains below the surface. Further, this task of sifting through information such as counting, or working out prices, or trying to recall the contents of ones pantry, is effortful and hinders perception and attention thus causing many in store marketing activities to remain unseen.
Psychologists refer to this
occurrence as the invisible gorilla effect.
It was named so by Daniel Simons (University of Illinois) &
Christopher Charbris (Harvard University) two researches who asked participants
to watch a video and count the number of basketball passes made by one of two
teams. The test effect introduced was
that during the video, a person in a gorilla suit walks through the middle of
the video. Their initial report indicated
that over 50% of participants (others have been higher) cannot accurately
report seeing the gorilla. How this
effect occurs is because the conscious thinking brain is hard at work on an
effortful mental task being distracted from the unconscious part of the brain
thus making us blind – Simon and Charbris coined it inattentional blindness
or perceptual
blindness. Understanding this
effect and minimising it has many implications for marketers & retailers.
Marketers cannot continue to channel hundreds of thousands of dollars into ad tracking and concept testing while ignoring the new main game and that is what the shopper actually sees in store. Unless marketers focus on the return on investment in their POS and in store promotions right now their brand ROI will continue to go through the floor. Within the growing tough retail environments there seems to be few FMCG brands that have substantially increased their ROI and strengthened their consumer franchise in recent times.
POS
effectiveness measures must include shopper research beyond the traditional observational
studies or assisted shopping studies where the shopper kindly reports to the probes
of ‘what were you looking at just then; what about just before’. This method of study is extremely ineffective
in this style of research because it does not actually measure what shoppers are
seeing, it only measures what they think they were seeing or what they think
they were seeing at the point of hearing the question.
Shopper marketers and insight
managers are wise to consider the use of mobile eye tracking technology in
their shopper research programs. Mobile
eye tracking has evolved considerably since its first introduction to the
marketing community many years ago. The
technological advances have vastly improved the eye tracking glasses which has
meant a considerable decrease in the concern about the ‘unnaturalness’ of the
study where in most cases less that 5% of participants are actually looked at
by other shoppers when wearing the glasses (the exception is children who seem
to be intrigued). The improvements in the
analytical software allows 1000’s of data points to be analysed at a greatly
reduced and with greater accuracy as the software algorithms do much of the
calculations that were once done by hand.
The benefit
of quantifying what shoppers are looking at is that you are now able to
confidently identify the perceptual
blindness in the retail environment based on objective quantitative data
and not subjective qualitative reports.
You are able to quantify what products, brands and POS executions are
actually looked at; for how long they are looked at and how they impact the
shopper decision making processes. Further,
you are able to understand the brands, products and POS executions that
unfortunately are invisible gorillas.
We have conducted multiple in store
eye tracking studies to assist retailers and national brands to understand
their in store efforts. In one
particular study we were able effectively identify which POS executions were
actually looked at by shoppers and ultimately led to their interest and
purchase of a products. Meanwhile, in
another study were able to successfully identify that, for over 95% of the
shoppers studied, a significant proportion of the in store marketing collateral
was not looked at during their shopping journey. However, even though the collateral was not
looked at by shoppers it was very well liked and through detailed analysis of
the eye tracking patterns (over 15,000 data points) we were able to identify
better locations for the POS so that it would have a higher visibility success
rate. Another study of shelf layout
indicated that the time to find a product based on the eye tracking data
greatly influenced the number of products purchased highlighting that the
product placement was currently ineffective and the better arrangement for the
brand would likely increase sales.
Next to
actual sales, mobile eye tracking research is the most current method to
consistently identify precisely in store effectiveness of POS and promotional
material. Recent university studies have
shown how rapidly the use of technology is influencing and changing everything
we do; the way we live; it is only a matter of time when eye tracking
technologies are an essential part of all shopper studies.
Dr Shane Moon
My Testimony Hello everyone. Am here to testify how I got my loan from Mr. Benjamin after I applied several times from various loan lenders who promised to help but they never gave me the loan. Until a friend of mine introduced me to Mr.Benjamin Lee promised to help me and indeed he did as he promised without any form of delay.I never thought there are still reliable loan lenders until I met Mr. Benjamin Lee, who indeed helped with the loan and changed my belief. I don't know if you are in any way in need of a genuine and urgent loan, Be free to contact Mr. Benjamin via WhatsApp +1-989-394-3740 and his email: 247officedept@gmail.com thank you.
ReplyDelete